GMO’s in unlabeled infant formulas………

by Dr. Alan Kadish

As the vote on measure 92 goes forward, in Oregon,  we will see if the abilities of spending huge sums of money will sway voters to stop consumers from having additional knowledge about GMO’s.

This very interesting study, done in October 2014, should give any women pause when choosing which formula to feed her newborn. I want to be clear, the key here is the finding of higher pesticide residues in  GMO formulas that is most concerning and should be an issue for every parent. This study does not determine the level of pesticides in these two formulas, however a number of other studies have indeed confirmed higher levels are common in GMO foods.

Once again it’s all about knowledge to make a good decision.

The jury is still not in, with  no consensus among scientists regarding the potential dangers of eating modified foods. The problem is that the specifics of the modifications may be the key and not so much the fact that we are indeed modifying the food.

The foods made with a focus on pesticide resistant might be the principle and intolerable GMO. Consider an example known as golden rice. In many areas of the world there is a lack of vitamin A in the diet. With a simple genetic modification to rice the enrichment of carotenoids, precursors to vitamin A, results in many children not become blind.

Is there a long term study of 10 or more years……not yet….but if the quality of life is our focus, would you prefer these kids go blind ? Very different than the issues of pesticide resistance and crop optimization, for quantity.

As an options based physician I want you to have an ability to make clear determinations of what you prefer. Without labeling that’s an impossibility.


Summary of Infant Formula Test Results for

Ingredients Genetically Engineered for Chemical Herbicide Tolerance 

Dr. Ray Seidler , principal investigator (541) 601-9955

Background :


Most genetically engineered crops grown in the United States today are engineered to either survive heavy exposure to chemical herbicide or produce an insecticide. Traditional foods crops have generally not been sprayed directly with herbicides since herbicide exposure would kill or damage the food crop. Herbicide application has historically required avoiding spraying desired food crops. Crops genetically engineered to tolerate exposure to herbicides, however, are intended to allow the direct and repeated application of herbicides directly to food crops. Typically an entire field of soy, canola or other common genetically engineered crops are sprayed multiple times during a given growing season to control competing weeds and then harvested. The most common herbicide crops have been engineered to survive is Monsanto’s glyphosate herbicide. Glyphosate is known as a “systemic” herbicide since it is systemically absorbed into plants.  A recently published study in the journal Food Chemistry has not surprisingly found significantly higher herbicide levels in genetically engineered soy than in conventionally grown soy and at concentrations that even Monsanto had previously described as “extreme.”

This raises significant concerns about the use of genetically engineered crops in infant food products in light of the well-documented vulnerability of infants to chemical pollutants.


Test summary:

Three common infant formula products were purchased in Portland, Oregon on October 8, 2014 and laboratory tested for the presence of soy products that had been genetically engineered for resistance to the herbicides glyphosate, which was first produced by Monsanto, and glufosinate, which is marketed by Bayer Crop Science. Two of the three infant formula products tested, Similac Soy Isomil and Enfamil Prosobee Powder Soy Infant Formula, tested positive for soy genetically engineered for resistance to spraying with glyphosate and glufosinate. Three specific tests were used to identify herbicide tolerant soy and more information regarding each of these products can be found at the links provided: Monsanto’s “Genuity Roundup Ready 2 Yield” soybean (Event code: MON89788) (reference info 
Monsanto’s “Round Up Ready Soy” (Event code: RRS (40-3-2)) (reference info:
 Bayer Crop Sciences, Liberty Link(LL27) soy (reference info:
Dr. Seidler, PhD, is a retired microbiologist who was the first EPA scientist to study geneticallyengineered crops and was a professor at Oregon State University for 16 years.
Bohn, T., Cuhra, M., Traavik, T., Sanden, M., Fagan, J., Primicerio, R. Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: Glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans, Food Chemistry 153 (2014) 207–215. (available on-line at
Report Date: 
October 17, 2014
 A Member of OMIC Group of Companies
Independent Analytical Laboratory 
3344 NW Industrial Street 
Portland, Oregon 97210 USA
Tel: (503) 223-1497 
Fax: (503) 223-9436 
Report No.:
Ray Seidler 
160 Pompadour Dr.
 Ashland, OR 97520 
Sample Description:
Sample ID: Date Received:
October 08, 2014
 Application of real-time TaqMan PCR; detection limit 0.10%
Method Reference
RRS (40-3-2)
LAB 609
LAB 964
LibertyLink (LL27)
LAB 962
This test and subsequent analysis was performed using protocols developed in-house for the detection of a specific event.
 Amplification of reference gene demonstrated that samples contained enough intact DNA to warrant analysis.
Page 1 of 1
The following two tabs change content below.
Dr. Kadish is an unusual physician often referred to as a "doctor detective". His expertise is the evaluation and treatment of complex disorders, typically after other physicians have been stumped, is renowned. He provides care for all family members and has additional training in autistic spectrum disorders and chronic complex diseases.

Latest posts by Dr. Alan Kadish, NMD (see all)